His logic breaks down completely in the second half of the argument. His assumption is that if you don't have control over everything in the universe, you don't have control over anything in the universe. It could be refined if he were to take account of all of his assumptions and articulate them into a coherent set of premises, but at that point he would still have to contend with actual physics, which I think he's a little behind on, but that could be because this is such an old video.
randomness dos not determine final outcome, for example like when you play cards there is randomness factor but there is also free will factor , how i will act on different cards given
Beth Davis
Clara Jo
Alfonso Lopez Jr